Ordinance 49 is back in the news.
ATLANTIC CITY — Last year I wrote a column about Ordinance 49 in Atlantic City, which restricted weekly rentals. It garnered 90 online comments, an all-time high at ACWeekly.com. Basically, the ordinance outlaws rentals for less than 90 days, though very few Americans take vacations 90 days long.
In private e-mails, and phone conversations, I heard from people around the state the country. This continued through the winter, and yesterday it started again more heavily. Investors and homeowners who have continued to rent in A.C. have received summonses and been hauled into court.
Here’s what needs pointing out today: A brief Internet search for weekly rentals turned up rentals in every community on our southern shore from Brigantine through Cape May. When I speak to coastal brokers around the state, they report all towns have weekly rentals. Nearby Ocean City, which bills itself as America’s Greatest Family Resort, gets $10,000 a week for some beach-block homes, and more for some beachfront.
Atlantic City is at the bottom of an economic heap, trying to dig herself out of a hole where underemployment and unemployment is well over 25 percent. We live in a county where 35 percent of the work force is tied to the casino industry in a town that has reported so many declines in gambling revenue the state had to step in and take over.
Last week, I read an article about rooms going as cheaply as $19 nightly in our empty hotels and how it conceivably brings in a less affluent clientele, painting still a worse picture of a town in decline.
Regardless, restricting home rentals stops the family trade the town and the CRDA says it desperately needs. I contend those wanting to spend thousands for a home are more likely to spread that wealth throughout the town and the area and spend far more during their stay. Now we are fining and threatening jail to those who invested in Atlantic City for renting to these more affluent consumers.
Atlantic City and County Board of Realtors MLS statistics show single-family homes in Atlantic City sold for an average price $150,292 in 2011, almost half the county average of $288,340.
These are the 2011 figures in the other Absecon Island communities.
Average Sales Price for 2011
Ventnor $408,979
Margate $683,202
Longport $1,176,933
And, our northern neighbor:
Brigantine $417,725
Yep, the further you get from Atlantic City the more worth your property gains. Atlantic City should take some lessons on how to rent from these affluent communities and spread the wealth instead of banning it.
I understand one of the reasons the law was passed is because sometimes the renters make noise. All I can think of is my long-gone friend Louise Donahue who summered for many years with her kids on the beach in Ocean City. On one corner was the summer home of Prince Ranier and American-born Princess Grace of Monaco. Grace’s father Jack had a property on the third corner. I am told Jack would rent, and occasionally his tenants were loud. Louise would grin and say: “At least they’re having fun. That’s why Ocean City is here.”
An additional fact to point out, many of those complaining about noise took advantage of cheap prices on new houses that were underwritten by the CRDA and the noise the casinos created to begin with. Funnier still, many of those homes are no longer worth what the homeowner paid and some make livings directly tied to the tourism trade. If people wanted to be in A.C., they’d be worth more.
We’ve been strangling the tourism goose-that-laid-the-golden-egg for years, and killing the flowers while watering the weeds. It’s time to start replanting the garden with new seeds and throw out the old ideas. They have not worked in the 34 years of gambling. Come on Atlantic City, wake up and smell your roses …. They stink!
Printed below is a letter I found in my e-mail last night, from one of the affected homeowners. It says a lot:
Is Atlantic City Poised to Become the Only Seashore Town on the Jersey Shore that Bans Vacation Rentals?
Yes it is. Atlantic City is presently cracking down on owners of vacation properties by instituting weekend stings and forcing owners to court and fining them hundreds of dollars with threats of thousands of dollars in fines with the intent of closing down all vacation rentals summer and winter in the city of Atlantic City.
In effect, Atlantic City will become the first and only city on the Jersey shore that will be closing it’s door to vacation renters unless they are renting a hotel room or are staying in a casino. The term of “beach house rentals” will not apply in Atlantic City.
Does this make sense? Of course not! The city Master Plan, which the city spent a very large sum to have produced, even mentioned that Atlantic City is sorely in need of Vacation Home Rentals more on par with other beach towns. Yet Atlantic City, with its all-encompassing wisdom, feels the right course is to shut down beach house rentals.
Go on the vacation sites such as VRBY (Vacation Rentals by Owners) and Homeaway.com and see the beautiful homes for rent in Atlantic City and read all the terrific comments by past renters to see exactly what Atlantic City is trying to stop.
I am a manager for three of these homes. They are beautifully maintained and an asset to the community. If they were to close, they would become abandoned properties and be a statistic in the foreclosure crisis. They would be abandoned and boarded up in first-class neighborhoods, affecting property values and appearances of Atlantic City’s comeback. Many of these homes are in prime Atlantic City neighborhoods. This would be an embarrassment to this city, or should be. Right now they draw people into these communities whom might never have reason to come here. Many first comments show amazement that such a beautiful place even exists in Atlantic City. Comments on the different rental properties show people have an amazing time, spend lots of money, enjoy the neighborhoods, casinos and beaches, and go home and spread the word.
The closure of these properties would mean loss of income to our cleaning crews, our maintenance people, our landscapers, our service people, carpet cleaners, jitneys, limo and transportation rentals, local restaurants and businesses that these vacation rentals generate. It is not insubstantial!
Atlantic City generates year round rentals. People want to come here in January and February and March, believe it or not. Beach rental houses allow large groups and family groups and several couples the choice to stay in a home for their vacation.
Why does Atlantic City think this is not OK? Every other shore community welcomes this business? As a manager I am aware of the occasional problem these rentals generate and it all can be solved in the best interests of everyone. I am sure every other beach town has dealt with issues but none of them shut down their rental market. Only Atlantic City Does That!
— Ivana Uhland
Atlantic City, NJ
Go here to read more Geoff's Page articles.
Geoff Rosenberger is a Broker Associate at Marketplace Realty. Read more of the acweekly.com columnist, Margate City resident and self-proclaimed visionary’s “Geoff’s Page,” including local snap shots, thoughts, Atlantic City news, random musings, GLBT-related news, “The Real Report,” and happenings every week — only at acweekly.com.
E-mail Geoff at geoffrosenberger@comcast.net or call him at 609-385-7585.
What do you think? Leave your comments and thoughts below.
We are spending millions of dollars telling folks to DO AC. We can’t welcome them to town by telling them they are doing it illegally.
As I read through the close to 100 posted comments, thoughts came to mind about our responsibility as citizens, Atlantic City residents, and Americans.
Some year-round residents have empty pockets from money needed. Tourist dollars flow through many hands. They are spent over and over again by locals paying their bills. We need to bring back the old Atlantic City where we concentrated on spreading affluence and money everywhere.
Article:
Inside the Columbus Hotel
Article:
National Coming Out Day at Steel Pier
Article:
I Do… You Can’t.
Article:
The Gay-Fil-A Controversy
Article:
Gay Pride Parade in Philly, RisQue Atlantic City at Resorts
Article:
Tyler Clementi - It’s Not Cool to Be Mean
Article:
Out and About - Love Is in the Air
Article:
Underwear Over the Rainbow
1. Anonymous said... on Mar 14, 2012 at 12:44PM
“I really feel for these homeowners and thank god for freedom of the press! ! I for one would pursue legal action against the city for such an egregious act and violation of all property owner's constitutional rights. inverse condemnation folks, I am sure you will be able to find someone willing to do this pro bono. Whose pockets are being lined now with this passage???”
2. Anonymous said... on Mar 14, 2012 at 12:48PM
“Wow! I thought we lived in the "land of the free!" I'm pretty sure the last time I checked, Atlantic city was located in the United States where people are supposed to be given the right of freedom. How can this ordinance prevent people from trying to make a living?”
3. AC still pushing this??? said... on Mar 14, 2012 at 12:54PM
“I'm speechless & that doesn't happen often; I hoped a compromise had been constructed to this unfair and unconstitutional ordinance/practice...No? This article says it all...wake up and trade in your short-sighted, absurdly parochial perspective AC gov. Homeowners, if you do not currently rent your houses via vacation rentals, have you considered this is a shore community and investors/buyers of these properties want the option (aka constitutional right) to rent as such...what if your situation changes-you want to sell- in disclosure of this ordinance, it may be a deal buster...OR you choose to rent your place...you would find yourself in a very unadvantageous position!!! LOCAL BUSINESSES...do I need to say it???? Guests at these vacation rentals SPEND MONEY WITH YOU- groceries, food, wine and spirits, souveniers, etc. Citizens, businesses get involved and fight this violation of your rights- hmmm, should we issue a ticket to AC for a violation of our constitutional rights?”
4. Fred J. Jones said... on Mar 14, 2012 at 12:58PM
“this is unreal .... with the state tourism conference in town this week, THIS article should be read by everyone there.”
5. Sarah said... on Mar 14, 2012 at 01:04PM
“Do local officials want to sabotage progress? Sounds like it. CRDA, Govenor Christie, competent outsiders, PLEASE INTERVENE NOW!!! Nepotism and corruption aided in the deterioration of AC, someone make it right...NOW. Nationwide, Americans enjoy renting vacation homes every year...a 90 day vacation in this economy, really who does that? Something is not quite right...wouldn't you agree? If noise if the concern, then how about an 'animal house ordinance' with standards to maintain, not banning vacation rentals...sheer ignorance.”
6. Anonymous said... on Mar 14, 2012 at 01:05PM
“How sad that AC management is concentrating its efforts on punishing the good people of AC who want to share the many fine attributes that this seashore town has to offer. To obliterate the rental market further obliterates AC as a whole...not just the homeowners but those who work at these homes to maintain them. Aren't there enough abandoned homes in AC without potentially adding more when the owners can't rent them out to pay the mortgages and taxes? AC management needs to clean up their act...not the rental homeowners. I have had the pleasure of staying in just about all of the seashore towns in NJ, especially OC, and when there is noise, the police are called and the noise stops. Plain and simple. Why does AC think they can't handle this on the rare occasion it may happen? Shame on the AC city reps! Seriously? You don't have anything else better to do?”
7. Jon said... on Mar 14, 2012 at 01:15PM
“Prior comments say it all...as a NJ resident very familiar with AC (and the stigma that as historically been attached) my question: AC City officials don't you want to be a thriving, clean, attractive community who not only rivals Vegas and surpasses PA, but also offers the same amenities as beach/shore communities throughout the nation...leave vacation home owners who rent alone to pursue free commerce, I imagine they are willing to monitor themselves and be accountable for quality of life (something that many in Ac have struggled with over the years- and not due to vacation home rentals). Those who rent a vacation home have discretionary earnings that they are willing to spend in AC...does that not stimulate tourism????”
8. Anonymous said... on Mar 14, 2012 at 01:16PM
“This is a disgrace... Just underscores that the Politicians are doing what is in their own best interest and not that of the people that they serve.THey should be voted out of office....”
9. Read me and weep said... on Mar 14, 2012 at 01:33PM
“The governor is giving us 5 years before they consider adding casinos in northern new jersey. Well....go ahead meadowlands with your planning and build out, the writing is on the wall for AC's demise!!! let's see if Christie's administration is serious about turning AC around or if they will continue to bury their heads between their legs and continue to ignore this travesty!”
10. Marchesa said... on Mar 14, 2012 at 01:39PM
“Absolutely revolting that this is happening in a town so desperate to recover in an economy still reeling and trying to get on its feet again. Just when it appears that there is hope, another example of the 'poor practices' the city needs to avoid. I have stayed at one of the vacation homes for several years now with my GFs for a fun getaway. We shop, shop and shop some more, always try a 'local dining establishment and then try our luck at the tables at Borgata. We used to stay in OC because we found AC frightening, but happened upon this charming little inlet area...never thought AC had anything like this...AC, don't eliminate yourself from the competition, don't vote yourself off of the island...wise up...vacation (short term rentals) are essential to the tourism initiative...take a class whatever you need to do, but you are really on the wrong path...don't unjustly target these vacation homeowners, appreciate them.”
11. Truth Sayer said... on Mar 14, 2012 at 01:54PM
“Let's see, the city solicitor got his cronies to pass this ordinance a year ago...and then told homeowners everything would be ok last round....interesting now how the solicitor was appointed to be a judge last month......I wonder of his appointment to the judicial body influenced the ridiculous fines and threat of jail time for exercising a homeowner's constitutional right!”
12. Ivana said... on Mar 14, 2012 at 01:57PM
“Thank you Thank you for all of your comments and support. Please everyone take a moment and post a comment and if you get a chance call the mayor and complain at 609-347-5400 and once again THANK YOU so very much.”
13. Inquirer Minds want to know said... on Mar 14, 2012 at 02:04PM
“Truth Sayer, who are you? Is this really true? This exemplifies corruption in its truest essence, FYI the mayor appoints all judges, "Boardwalk Empire" reigns again! Are you saying even the mayor is involved in this?”
14. Coastal corruption said... on Mar 14, 2012 at 02:17PM
“How do you spell corrupt? AC officials spell it "ordinance 49". If this is an example of AC reconstruction, then no matter who funnels money in, there is NO chance of success. Ever noticed one of those plastic grocery bags floating aimlessly in the wind about the city? That is a great symbol for the corrupt AC officials, they will go whichever way the wind blows which is typically in their own best interest (personal interest that is). Too bad Irene didn't blow those bags out of town last year leaving a clean landscape for rebuilding a great AC!”
15. Anonymous said... on Mar 14, 2012 at 02:26PM
“I often tell these 2 stories about my childhood years in Atlantic City and Absecon Island.
1. In my pre-teen years a group of us neighborhood kids would board an early morning bus from Absecon to spend the day on the Steel Pier. I saw the Supremes, 4 Seasons, and even Brenda Lee. We would get the last bus back to Absecon around midnight. We were all under 13 years of age, and without parents. That's how safe A.C. was in the early 1960's.
2. The summer before leaving for college a group of us HSHS grads were meeting a friend who worked at the Bell Building on Pacific Avenue, it was around mid-night, the 4th of July weekend. We walked along side a white Rolls as we headed south along Pacific Avenue. That's how crowed the city was that summer.
Now I ask the question, are you better off now? I think not.”
16. Bill said... on Mar 14, 2012 at 02:28PM
“I do not really ever comment on articles, but was so astonished when I read this. My son owns many properties in SC in beach communities and rents them. I cant imagine a city passing such an ordinance. This is just plain anti-American. Who endorsed this and whose interests do they represent?”
17. I WANT A TAX REFUND said... on Mar 14, 2012 at 02:33PM
“I am astonished that this issue has not been resolved! As a taxpayer I am appalled that my tax dollars are being directed to enforce this. Is it code enforcement or the police issuing these citations? Whose paying the overtime to these folks, last I looked no city office works on the weekends! Again, such a fine example of continued frivolous spending of our tax dollars, why not use these funds to hire more policeman to stop the violence in our neighborhoods?! Where are your priorities mr mayor? Get to work on things that promote quality of life for everyone. TO ALL LOCAL RESIDENTS, DO YOU REALIZE THAT YOUR PROPERTY VALUES ARE BEING NEGATIVELY IMPACTED BY THIS DECISION?! CALL THE MAYOR ND YOUR COUNCILMAN AND PUT A STOP TO THE PROLIFERATION OF YOUR FUTURE AND POCKET BOOKS! GEOFF ROSENBERGER FOR MAYOR, he's the only one willing to tell the truth!”
18. Lisa said... on Mar 14, 2012 at 03:11PM
“Just when AC seems to be coming around as a nice place to visit, this makes no sense at all! We vacation at the Jersey shore every year and have not, until recently, even considered going to AC. However, on a recent stay at a privately owned RENTAL property, we were really impressed with the improvements we saw in the city. We had a great time and I would plan on returning. Hope city government reconsiders or else I think AC will slip back into disrepair.”
19. Yen said... on Mar 14, 2012 at 03:40PM
“I personally think the motivating factor behind this apparent insanity is GREED! Looks like govt leaders who missed the boat buying crda subsidized property is looking to force foreclosures so that they can pick up the ruins at pennies on the dollar! THEN I BET SUDDENLY COUNCIL WILL THEN CHANGE THE ORDINANCE TO LET THEIR BUDDIES REAP THE BENEFITS!”
20. Anonymous said... on Mar 14, 2012 at 03:50PM
“IS THERE REALLY NOTHING BETTER THE CITY CAN DO WITH THEIR RESOURCES. Instead of paying code enforcement overtime hours, waste the time of the city prosecutors office, why don't they do something to help the 25% unemployment rate? Last I looked, attorneys aren't making minimum wage either! I sense a hidden agenda for sure!”
21. Trish said... on Mar 14, 2012 at 04:35PM
“This happened in ft lauderdale as well with the local government. The state stepped in and passed legislation that superseded local authority after several lawsuits were filed where homeowners were awarded hundreds of thousands of dollars. You all need to band together and let local government know this is a serious infringement on your rights and you are willing to fight them to the very end! They are hoping the little guy won't know any better or have the resources to fight them..PROVE THEM WRONG! In law.... PRECEDENT IS EVERYTHING! Also make sure you read through all the documents and provide your legal team of how this ordinance was passed in the first place. I would imagine you"ll find some foul play there!”
22. Peyton H said... on Mar 14, 2012 at 05:41PM
“This is just so unfortunate and I truly feel for these folks who have invested in AC when the majority of individuals would not touch the city. If the recent efforts to lose the seedy rep of AC and clean it up to make it attractive to affluent people as a destination are to succeed, then vacation short term rentals must be available as a choice. To many travelers it is an attractive alternative and creates a revenue stream to local businesses along with creating additional jobs via needs for cleaning, landscaping, etc. Think, think globally, think economy, think period!”
23. Linda Puia said... on Mar 14, 2012 at 08:20PM
“This is a terrible ordinance! Why would you keep the many families, who love to come to Atlantic City and want to relax and need the space of a home, from coming? That just doesn't make sense. Anyone who buys a home should have the right to use that home as they would like to, it is their investment, not the city's. This should be stopped!”
24. de said... on Mar 14, 2012 at 09:12PM
“this is crazy! why would you keep away vacationers ? ones that has been coming here bringing there family's and friends for years, that's just plain stupidity!! inst that what city's and towns want? they visit restaurants,shops,casinos e.t.c.revenue!!! they keep this up and there will be no Atlantic city.my opinion is its there homes to to what they want.it ANTI-AMERICAN If you ask me.its not fair to the people that love to come to the shore they could of went anywhere but they chose Atlantic city now what??”
25. Lynn said... on Mar 15, 2012 at 09:04AM
“It's such a shame what the world has come to! The local governments actions are no different thanthe executives from Enron or world com. To those officials that fail to bring this to light and take the necessary action to address these issues decisively already are just as accountable! Stop turning a blind eye and admit your mistake! Mr. mayor prove to us you are capable of leading this city and put an end to wasting our tax dollars unless you want the state to audit your spending habits once again. Maybe then you may be able to sleep at night.”
26. Anonymous said... on Mar 15, 2012 at 09:08AM
“This ordinance is truly like a 'fish out of water' in a shore community. I can understand ordinances governing property aesthetics, noise and tenant behavior, but really, whose to say that a "90 day" tenant would not behave poorly? And theyre in for 90 days. Lets just cut to the chase, someone who is an AC official must have pushed this thru because they personally do not want others to do short term rentals. This ordinance only deters homeowners from being able to offer a vacation rental. other shore communities have animal house ordinances NOT a restriction on rental lengths and this addresses the issue. Oh, but I forgot this is AC, why would their strategies make sense? Most owners of homes in shore towns are secondary properties and they want the option to rent short term, this restriction could influence an investor to but elsewhere. Then, would these homes sit abandoned in disrepair with delinquent taxes? Most likely, wise up.”
27. Davis said... on Mar 15, 2012 at 09:16AM
“I am shocked that the mayor Appointed Ward to be a judge, was it not clear last year the lack of integrity of how he manipulated his friends to get this ordinance passed in the first place ? Let me guess, now that he is a judge he has all the power to impose these ridiculous fines and threat of jail time to otherwise law abiding citizens. Do you not see the wrong here, he is corrupt and now has the power to continue harassing these poor people. This is the man they are grooming for mayor! Calling the FBI- we have a white collar crime underway in AC!”
28. Anonymous said... on Mar 15, 2012 at 09:29AM
“A million dollars was spent on the masterplan, will our officials heed the recommendations of this study recognizing the value and contribution of these homeowners to the growth of tourism? Or will they continue to heed the study by the director of planning on his recommendation to stop these rentals as published in the minutes of council on the passing of ordinance 49 and 50? Btw- the planning director is wards neighbor...OH NO NOTHING FUNNY GOING ON HERE!”
29. Mia said... on Mar 15, 2012 at 09:39AM
“WHAT A DEMONSTRATION OF CONTINUED WASTEFUL GOVERNMENT SPENDING! The city manages a 3.4 billion casino industry, my guess is there will be a new billion dollar industry for AC in the land of litigation! All homeowners in AC deserve every penny! HOW AMBARASSING THAT OFFICIALS ARE SO FOCUSED ON THIS ISSUE AS OPPOSED TO BRINGING JUSTICE TO THE KILLERS ON OUR STREETS! PRIORITIZE FOLKS and put your smoke pipes away!”
30. Tiffany said... on Mar 15, 2012 at 10:10AM
“Just read this article and did a little digging on this ordinance. I actually have a beach home in Ventnor, but my hubbie and I have been looking at the Northeast Inlet area at a home recently on the market. It is one of those houses on Maine Avenue. However, I didn't know about this ridiculous ordinance. Does AC grasp and comprehend what thin ice they are one regarding reputation and the perspective of those who do not live there? It is not pretty, but appeared to have hope. Things like this make me think twice. I think the focus needs to be on clean-up, and of course crime. AC you've come a long way baby, don't stop now...stick to a strategy and intelligently implement. Please do not become bogged down with wasteful 'personal agendas'. You have hope, don;t let a few bad eggs ruin your hopes. Remember Revel cannot solve all...wake up, clean up, wise up”
31. Karma said... on Mar 15, 2012 at 10:24AM
“I hope the city can make adjustments and get back on course. This is a shame. I feel so badly for those homeowners, especially in this economy. Never really thought much of the city's gov't.”
32. Greg said... on Mar 15, 2012 at 10:39AM
“Focus on what matters and get the CRDA master plan in action. Leave your archaic ways behind and help shape the new AC, city officials. Your old methods helped make AC what it was- dirty, crime ridden and at the very bottom of the NJ economy- even PA casinos surpassed you in revenue. Hope you revise your thoughts.”
33. Shane said... on Mar 15, 2012 at 12:02PM
“Seems to me like these local officials are not competent to run the city. Problem is that AC is not the typical 40,000 or so community due to the casinos and the tourism influx. Ac is a small town with big city issues and is in dire need of a competent government and officials. Just because they grew up in the city does not mean they fit the bill..get a grip and clean out all of the idiots”
34. unbelievable said... on Mar 15, 2012 at 05:34PM
“How can you promote tourism as a shore location with no vacation home rental alternatives? Families and other visitors with money to spend in the city at casinos and local businesses, etc want choices, period. These vacation homes must be in the mix.”
35. neilp said... on Mar 15, 2012 at 07:25PM
“i was a casino pioneer habving left philadelphia for vegas in 1972.i was so glad to come back in 1978 to open casinos in ac.i was treated like crap ,the customers were treated like crap.prices were too high and who would come back .the owners were greedy and lost their customer base.”
36. Anonymous said... on Mar 15, 2012 at 10:42PM
“That is too bad as it is a combo of many things to mske a successful tourist destination- especially how a town treats tourists...i am hoping thst casinos have raised the bar for service and overall experience! Employees should slso be treated well. One of my friends is a vacation homeowner in aC and they get rave reviews and provide a positive experience. They slso hire local labor.”
37. Cara M said... on Mar 16, 2012 at 08:19AM
“I have been a guest of one of the vacation beach houses for rent several times now. I always saw Atlantic City as dirty and disgusting and never ever as. Beach town. My GFs and I always went to Vegas until we realized there were lovely houses in that area by the inlet. It changed our view on the city as we stayed at a home by the beach, had a great experience and enjoyed the casinos like Ceasars, Harrahs and Borgata. We saw a side we couldnt believe existed. Although many parts of that city are not appealing the vacation house changed our view. Now we come every year- all of us are in the $100,000 income bracket and are happy to spend $$$ there rather than Vegas as its much more convenient for us to travel to. It seems to this outsider that someone does not grasp what tourist $$$ do for a town and they have a choice on where to visit, AND need a choice in where to stay..our group prefers a house as we gather once a year-dont force us back to Vegas.”
38. ANONYMOUS said... on Mar 16, 2012 at 08:19AM
“Hmmmm....this is almost as bright of an idea as when the mayor ordered the police to stop patrolling garages after the carjacking that killed a couple on MLK a few months ago. You guys need to get the states attorney involved, he overturned the mayors decision and helped make THE RIGHT DECISION FOR THE PEOPLE OF AC! MR STATES ATTORNEYI HOPE YOU CARE ENOUGH THIS TIME AROUND! PLEASE HELP US!”
39. Kennar said... on Mar 16, 2012 at 08:35AM
“This is seriously hitting upon a violation of rights. The city should be grateful that these citizens actually believed in the town when many laughed at them for buying in AC. Most draw a line of consideration beginning north to Brigantine or south to Ventnor when considering investment. Hey AC, dont you want to grow into positive economy, tourism, reputation and all?! Or slip back into seediness? Still on a slippery slope and need to. Clean up your political circus. This town needs critical state intervention. The local officials (officials used loosely) need to go. Incompetence and corruption cant then it around”
40. Anonymous said... on Mar 16, 2012 at 08:36AM
“I was approached about 8 months ago from a church elder at St Ann's to help some refugee families get acclimated to the American way of life. I connected one of these families to several homeowners to help them get through the winter after the the parents were laid off in their housekeeping jobs. At first the family of 5 were either walking or riding their bikes with cleaning supplies in hand to make money to bring food home to the table. I was ecstatic the other day when I saw this family in a minivan on Maine ave packing away their cleaning supplies!!! I really admire these people! Help folks like this Pursue the American dream and give them programs to be self supportive and not dependent on welfare or unemployment. MR MAYOR LOCAL OFFICIALS, MAY BE YOU CAN LEARN A LESSON OR 2 FROM THESE FOLKS!”
41. Anonymous said... on Mar 16, 2012 at 08:50AM
“MR GOVERNOR, PLEASE GET INVOLVED AND SHOW AMERICA THAT YOU DID NOT TURN A BLIND EYE TO ALL THIS AND IT WILL PROVE THAT YOU ARE NOT JUST ABOUT
LIP SERVICE!! PLEASE HELP THE LOCAL PEOPLE OF AC AND NOT JUST REVEL AND BIG BUSINESS!! SMALL BUSINESSES ARE A VITAL ECONOMIC ENGINE TO CREATING A STRONG COMMUNITY THAT AC DESPERATELY NEEDS! SAVE SMALL BUSINESSES!”
42. JB said... on Mar 16, 2012 at 09:02AM
“The city needs to be educated in civil planning, tourism, city management among a plethera of items. Bottom-line to support the progress needed in the city knowledgeable parties are necessary to effectively execute turning the corner into a thriving and attractive tourist destination.”
43. Anonymous said... on Mar 16, 2012 at 09:11AM
“JB, the sad thing is that MANY multimillion dollar mastaerplans and feasibility studies have been done and shared with local officials. APPARENTLY, local leadership thinks their ideas are better and they know what it takes! FYI- REVEL wanted to build a service center on Massachusetts and Atlantic in an area that looks like "Beirut by the sea!". COUNCIL FIRST REJECTED This development unanimously and then came back to the table again a month later and unanimously approved it.....Kevin what did you do change their minds??? I don't have 300 million of tax payer dollars at my disposal, help me help you mr desanctis, all these homes connect your property to Gardners basin, do you want your guests walking through a community with boarded up houses?”
44. Anonymous said... on Mar 16, 2012 at 09:15AM
“This is unconstitutional!! Again , Atlantic City politicians abusing their power. Never once did the city consult or inform these residents that this ordinance was being passed. Never once did they give us a forum to hear OUR side. I bought my $550,000 home as an investment property- because I believed in the revitalization of Atlantic City. Now, without warning, I am forced to stop rentals. Is Atlantic City only comfortable with delapidated and poverty stricken real estate? These politicians just can't have anything of value thrive in this city. What a shame! Wait till our governor hears of this!!!”
45. Amazed said... on Mar 16, 2012 at 09:15AM
“Just curious, do Atlantic City officials realize that its not just about what they think or their interests? Just because one grew up there doesnt mean current officials are competent to lead or even plan or strategize. They are truly pathetic.”
46. Anonymous said... on Mar 16, 2012 at 09:18AM
“MR PALMIERI, your making the big bucks to bring this city back (225,000 dollars to be exact) Where are you and where does the CRDA stand on this???? What say you???? We,re asking you to make a difference, will you turn a blind eye as well?????”
47. JB said... on Mar 16, 2012 at 09:20AM
“I had not been aware if a Master Plan ir the studies. Sounds as if voluminous dollars are being thrown away. This city needs help now.”
48. Oops said... on Mar 16, 2012 at 09:22AM
“Peeeeeeuuuuuu I smell corruption and urban decay”
49. Anonymous said... on Mar 16, 2012 at 09:22AM
“Sources tell me that CRDA has been brought up to speed on this issue, we are all anxiously awaiting your response!”
50. Anonymous said... on Mar 16, 2012 at 09:31AM
“This is just pathetic. How sad that with all other barriers to turn AC around such as struggling economy, collapsed real estate market, deterioration from years of mismanagement, high crime rate to name a few, that the city officials are really just another category in the long list. Please get out of the way of progress, let experts take over, Move It”
51. Triage said... on Mar 16, 2012 at 09:40AM
“Has anyone sent this to pinky kravitz??? Get him involved, he has always been a pillar of this community and I'm sure he will have a lot to say about this!
PINKY HELP THESE FOLKS! You are the ony one who has the courage to,stand up to these dictators. You are the subject matter expert on AC and I have been following your stories for years. I count on you to keep us informed and you seem to always speak the truth on tough matters! Tell us, is this right in your eyes?”
52. Gail R said... on Mar 16, 2012 at 09:40AM
“I am in your corner vacation homeowners; as a resident in Northern NJ but owner in OC with a spouse in high end real estate, you are what that city needs. Hang in there, we are watching and support you all. Signed, a concerned NJ resident”
53. CHEATED WIVES said... on Mar 16, 2012 at 09:54AM
“Let's ask the judges wife about his integrity......or is your arrangement only a financial one??? Need I say more? once a cheater always a cheater!”
54. Foolish practices said... on Mar 16, 2012 at 10:22AM
“The city of ac better modify their course or they are destined to jump back onto the wrong tracks and obliterate the improvements that have been long awaited and desperately needed. I think they want the crime, impoverished areas, bad name and corruption so they can continue to have their little town to themselves. Wouldnt be surprised if they want to force these homeowners to foreclosure or short sell so one of their own can grab them. The old Boardealk Empire style of city mgt cant continue.”
55. Payton said... on Mar 16, 2012 at 10:27AM
“I sat and listened to a presentation that the mayor gave quoting "AC IS SERIOUS ABOUT DOING BUSINESS". Mr. Mayor....what you say when cameras are on you is one thing but your actions speak to another. I echo the comments about wasting tax dollars to attempt to enforce a law that violates everything our forefathers fought to protect! Terrorism lives in AC!”
56. Adam T said... on Mar 16, 2012 at 10:32AM
“Ouch this topic really hits home, I was very close to acting on a thought to take advantage of the low priced buyers market and invest in ac, but there is no way I will buy a second house in a shore town with no option to rent short term, geez that is what the shore is about. Families friends garhering ar a shore rental for their weeks vacation. Looks like Ill have to buy elsewhere. What idiots these ac bozos are.”
57. AC Citizen said... on Mar 16, 2012 at 10:49AM
“There's always 3 sides to a story folks! MR. MAYOR I voted for you, please step up and tell us none of this is true and the reasons why you did this? Is there a valid reason for ordinance 49 and 50? Give us the reason why you think this ordinance promotes tourism, are these homeowners violating the law? Are they posing as vacation homes but are really whore or crack houses? Tell us the why and give me some hope that believing in you was not a bad decision!”
58. Anonymous said... on Mar 16, 2012 at 10:53AM
“Mr. Rosenberger, have you spoken to the local officials to get their comments on this? What is this really about? Dare you say? I would love to hear their side too!”
59. Anonymous said... on Mar 16, 2012 at 11:00AM
“Good point AC citizen! Mr. Rosenberger, are you being objective? Interview the mayor and tell the people the entire story!”
60. Anonymous said... on Mar 16, 2012 at 11:03AM
“I'd rather he interview cheated wives!! Lol, Whats the story there???”
61. Anonymous said... on Mar 16, 2012 at 11:03AM
“I'd rather he interview cheated wives!! Lol, Whats the story there???”
62. Anonymous said... on Mar 16, 2012 at 11:56AM
“This is a quote from Lisa Cartmell, the person in charge of rebranding our city and key executive of ACA:
"I would say they are right to be skeptics because a lot of people do make promises, but the reason I came [aboard] is because there are certainly very visible things that are different than they were in the past," says Cartmell.
"There is clear leadership, there's clear motivation, there's clear authority, and there is money to be invested and that is being spent here, whether it's the CRDA money or the ACCVA money that is being spent to bring people here. You know, that's a pretty powerful combination. When you have a plan, a leadership, and the resources to do it, I mean, there hasn't been that kind of cohesion and commitment and really 'the path.' The path is laid out and now we just need to execute it."
Lisa do you speak the truth or just more bullshit! Ordinance 49 and 50 are negating everything you are saying. Please do share! We the people are listening!
”
63. Carl O said... on Mar 16, 2012 at 12:19PM
“These are some strong thoughts being posted, and I cant say I dont agree 100%. Problem is that people typically do not become involved until their rights are infringed upon. So I would strongly suggest if you own a house in the city, think about it- shore town, weekend/week vacations by families looking for a house to rent to enjoy their time spent...dont you want them to consider ac? Potential buyer pruchasing a second home, may not use all the time, may want to take advantage of renting it out at the shore. They all may have to look elsewhere and may pass on buying a shore home with such restrictions...or vacationers may look beyond ac.”
64. Curiousity said... on Mar 16, 2012 at 12:20PM
“FYI I read the master plan which identified "nuisance properties" in the city where the number of calls requesting deployment of our police department to these locations were tallied up. Some properties had well over 100 calls in a month and Not one of these properties on VRBO or homeaway was on this list! so why might i ask, since this is being tracked by the city anyway are these properties being targeted. I am offering up facts not emotionally charged responses for our leaders to address, all I am asking for is some answers.”
65. Scott said... on Mar 16, 2012 at 12:27PM
“I wonder if the city is prepared to handle the lawsuits that will
surely result from the home owner bankruptcies that will surely
take place as a result of this Unconstitutional Ordinance..
This seems like an episode straight out of Boardwalk Empire...”
66. WHATEVER said... on Mar 16, 2012 at 12:35PM
“To all homeowners, make sure you give your attorney a copy of the master plan, your legal standing and supporting evidence can all be found in that document so that you do not need to waste money on "expert testimony" Just subpoena the consulting firm and see what they found in there research!
Its all there and i hope it will bring some justice for you folks!”
67. PEACE said... on Mar 16, 2012 at 12:43PM
“ITS ALL ABOUT BIG BUSINESS, THERE IS NO ROOM FOR MOM AND POP SHOPS IN AC!”
68. Ivana said... on Mar 16, 2012 at 12:51PM
“Thank you everyone for your support and comments. Please don't let this stop you from renting or buying our homes in Atlantic City. WE WILL NOT LET THIS STAND! Thank you comment #66 I have sent my origional letter to every South Jersey politician. The counsil meeting is Wednesday March 21 at 5:00. If any of you out there are interested in this please try to attend. I appreciate all of your comments so very much.”
69. FACT OR FICTION said... on Mar 16, 2012 at 12:53PM
“IS BRUCE WARD REALLY THE JUDGE ON ALL THESE CASES? HE WAS THE ONLY ONE THAT TESTIFIED AND BROUGHT THIS MATTER TO COUNCIL IN THE FIRST PLACE AND WHEN HE WAS CONFRONTED LAST YEAR BY THE HOMEOWNERS. ASK HIM HOW HE RESPONDED. I HEARD WHAT HE SAID WAS RECORDED AND SOMEONE MAY HAVE HIM ON RECORD . LESSON TO YOU HOMEOWNERS, YOU HAVE TO LEARN TO PLAY DIRTY TO GET ANYWHERE WITH LOCAL POLITICIANS”
70. Anonymous said... on Mar 16, 2012 at 01:02PM
“Ivana, remember that lady that stood up to TRUMP and the city from seizing her property by way of eminent domain? well shes still there and trump plaza lost their fight. she got free legal help from a group that did not stand by to let the little man be raped by big business. You need to reach out to her and I am sure she would be sympathetic to your cause!”
71. Anonymous said... on Mar 16, 2012 at 01:16PM
“COUNCIL CANNOT HELP YOU!! THEY UNANIMOUSLY VOTED FOR THIS ORDINANCE. DONT BOTHER WASTING YOUR TIME GOING TO A COUNCIL MEETING, GET TO THE BUTT OF THIS AND YOUR ONLY CHANCE IS TO FILE A LAWSUIT NOWWWWW! TIME IS MONEY AND I PROMISE YOU THAT YOU WILL GET NOWHERE GOING THAT ROUTE! I WISH I WERE WRONG BUT I SPEAK FROM EXPERIENCE UNFORTUNATELY”
72. An out of state Attorney says.. said... on Mar 16, 2012 at 01:29PM
“The way I see this issue, it is an unconstitutional attempt to limit competition. Constitution states that no property shall be taken for public use without compensation. A good lawyer will draw parallel between the Constitution and this situation. Although the property is not being taken for public use, because you are prohibited to rent it out, you will have no other use for this property and thus it is essentially “taken away” from you. There are NJ cases that deal with an issue of competition (albeit not in terms of vacation rentals). I understand from the article that one of the reasons for this Ordinance is that the rental vacation guests generate noise. This can be taken care of with noise ordinances, not by taking away the individuals’ right to conduct business.”
73. Anonymous said... on Mar 16, 2012 at 01:37PM
“The creation of this bogus ordinance by BRUCE WARD is evidence that he does not care about what is good for Atlantic City but he does know what is good for his wallet and personal interests. We cannot stand for such corruption!”
74. Anonymous said... on Mar 16, 2012 at 02:04PM
“Homeowner's I have 2 words for you- Inverse Condemnation
That's all you need to know!
Go get'em”
75. Anonymous said... on Mar 16, 2012 at 02:05PM
“Yeppers, he is a liar and cheater but makes the grade in the eyes our mayor! IMPEACHMENT!!!!”
76. Danielle W said... on Mar 16, 2012 at 02:24PM
“This is truly moving into the absurd realm of blatent corruption. It is never a surprise to see scandals, corruption etc in government, but it is such a shame that these local officials cannot move over and let progress take the reigns. It is NOT for the good of all when any aspect of tourism is attacked in a case of a city struggling to become a destination. It is evident that the officials do not have a grasp on all components of what is needed and have no regard for the experts who do know what it takes. It is my opinion that this ordinance is a direct slap in the face of CRDA, the State and the Honorable Gov Christie (aside from a clear infringement on property owners rights). It reflects an absolute resentment on the part of the local officials toward CRDA, et al. BUT, the city would not be where it is now without these outside entities, certainly not Langford and his motley crew...”
77. Anonymous said... on Mar 16, 2012 at 02:26PM
“Thanks number 74. (From Wikipedia) Inverse condemnation is a term used in the law to describe a situation in which the government takes private property but fails to pay the compensation required by the 5th Amendment of Constitution. In some states the term also includes damaging of property as well as taking it. In order to be compensated, the owner must then sue the government. In such cases the owner is the plaintiff and that is why the action is called inverse – the order of parties is reversed, as compared to the usual procedure in direct condemnation where the government is the plaintiff who sues a defendant-owner to take his or her property.”
78. Anonymous said... on Mar 16, 2012 at 02:27PM
“Continuation from #77 comment..
The taking can be physical (e.g., land seizure, flooding, retention of possession after a lease to the government expires, deprivation of access, removal of ground support) or it can be a regulatory taking (when regulations are so onerous that they make the regulated property unusable by its owner for any reasonable or economically viable purpose).
The latter (regulatory taking) applies in this situation. WOW Attorneys should be jumping at the opportunity to get in on this!
”
79. Anonymous said... on Mar 16, 2012 at 02:28PM
“Yet the scary part is that Lisa Cartmell says there's never been a better spirit of cooperation in this city!”
80. forward thinker said... on Mar 16, 2012 at 02:37PM
“I hope the homeowners of these vacation houses overcome this blockade of their rights. 100% agreement with the type of ordinance that would be reasonable, which is a 'quality of life'; 'animal house' or noise ordinance to ensure a standard is maintained. I bet the owners would be on board with that. These types of ordinances are very common and are effective and sensible in managing short term rentals. For those who expect a dead quiet, solitary environment in a shore town, you better earn enough for a private island or upscale private gated beach community. Get real. The stupidity of these officials and their supporters makes me cringe.”
81. Anonymous said... on Mar 16, 2012 at 02:37PM
“Your welcome #77, I just want justice to be served! Class action suit is your best option, post something in the local papers to draw these homeowners out, once they act collaboratively and once they find out there is opportuniuty for money, they will come running to you! When you win, the city will be responsible for attorney fees too! What a great world we live in eh? It's your only remedy! TRUST ME PLAYING NICE GETS YOU NOWHERE”
82. Anonymous said... on Mar 16, 2012 at 02:42PM
“You must fight fire with fire!! Nice guys always end up last!
”
83. Kris F said... on Mar 16, 2012 at 02:54PM
“I own houses I rent out in Belmar and have successfully managed short term rentals for several years, along with using for my enjoyment and that of family and friends. I abide by the local guidelines for rentals and am thankful for the animal house ordinance when an irresponsible owner pops up, see link :http://belmar.com/municipal/municipal-services/code-enforcement/animal-house-information/
Check out the ordinance/info via this link. The individuals who created this have much insight into the value of short term rentals to Belmar & know that the property owners have rights, but also bring much revenue to the community. IF AC is to compete and survive to emerge as a tourist destination that has it ALL, then they cannot restrict rentals for weekly/weekend visitors. Our support is with you AC rental owners- defend your rights!”
84. Anonymous said... on Mar 16, 2012 at 02:56PM
“Wow Kris, GREAT point! Thanks so much! This ordinance defintely makes sense to me!”
85. Anonymous said... on Mar 16, 2012 at 02:57PM
“Just to clarify #84, the Belmar animal house ordinance makes sense NOT the AC 'violation of rights' ordinance. :)”
86. Anonymous said... on Mar 16, 2012 at 03:08PM
“As noted several citations have been issued to owners of AC vacation rentals within the last few weeks forcing owners to Municipal Court. It’s my understanding that BRUCE WARD is a Municipal Judge in the AC court system. Bruce Ward created this ridiculous ordnance.. doesn’t that pose a conflict of interest!? Sounds like there is opportunity for this corruption to run even deeper.”
87. OMG said... on Mar 16, 2012 at 03:15PM
“That is horrible! AC Citizens who CHOOSE to rent their properties that they have worked hard to afford FIGHT YOUR BATTLE!”
88. Anonymous said... on Mar 16, 2012 at 03:18PM
“I heard from a friend that in court, it was said that even if the homeowners MOTHER answered the door, OR if the door wasnt answered that a citation would be issued. That my fellow Americans is so ridiculous. Does AC understand this is the USA? Really, a ticket if my own mother answered my door? AC- you are PATHETIC”
89. Smythe said... on Mar 16, 2012 at 03:27PM
“WOW, are you kidding #88. I can't believe the extent of this ordinance when you consider these people's rights as property owners.”
90. Anonymous said... on Mar 16, 2012 at 03:27PM
“Better yet #86 report ward to the bar assocociation and have him disbarred!!
”
91. Anonymous said... on Mar 16, 2012 at 03:31PM
“Someone send this to the national media and maybe you will get Christie's ear! Let's see if this aids them in their attempts to attract big money! This will for sure hit them where it COUNTS!”
92. Ivana said... on Mar 16, 2012 at 03:52PM
“Once again Thanks for all the comments. I am learning alot from all of you and seeing new opportunities and directions to take. All I ask though is please don't make personal attacks. Do post your comments. I am wondering if there is an attorney out there willing to take this case if we have to go that way?”
93. Davis said... on Mar 16, 2012 at 04:06PM
“STATE THE TRUTH AND ONLY THE TRUTH! You are exposing corruption, everything matters here! A politicians life both personal and professional is public information and becomes VERY RELEVANT IN COURT”
94. Anonymous said... on Mar 16, 2012 at 04:10PM
“My thoughts are, attacking one's pocketbook doesn't get any more personal now does it?”
95. Whistleblowers unite said... on Mar 16, 2012 at 04:12PM
“Have a voice and speak out for your rights.”
96. Garrett said... on Mar 16, 2012 at 04:29PM
“Good luck with all homeowners, you have my support against Ordinance 49, please keep us posted.”
97. Whats your agenda AC? said... on Mar 16, 2012 at 06:49PM
“Are we certain AC official sincerely want the support of CRDA and view them as a valued partner? Did they have a choice? Can you imagine what the town would be without the casinos and CRDA? Behaviors of the city officials still have undertones of resentment of state intervention and strengthened presence of CRDA in redevelopment of the city and tourism district. Not certain if all are playing well in the sandbox...CRDA has amazing ideas and a great strategy...lets all make certain they have the latitude to make it happen without lingering undercurrents of city officials who put 'self' not city first!!!!”
98. Anonymous said... on Mar 17, 2012 at 08:50AM
“I own 4 properties in AC. It looks like lately the wellbeing of my family depends on the good will of the code enforcement department. I have been in court more than 10 times in the last 2 years. I have been asked to fix, repair or replace: Driveways, Kitchens, Bathrooms, floors, decks and everything else someone can imagine. Every inspector has a different idea how a property should look like. They just LOVE me! The building department is another big joke. Let’s start class A lawsuit, there are plenty of people in our situation. Any attorneys around that would be interested..?”
99. Anonymous said... on Mar 17, 2012 at 09:03AM
“My family visited AC for a wedding last year. While my entire family stayed at Caesars, we chose a terrrific waterfront beach house for our stay! I personally would not have it any other way. I have 4 small children and am not comfortable with the casino environment. We explored other hotel options in the city and were appalled at the surrounding environment and did not feel safe!! We had the best of both worlds, big city activities with a feel of small town charm in this neighborhood. I must say without this option my family will not be back, WHAT A SHAME, it gave us some pricesless memories! adios AC, we will spend our tax dollars at the hamptons!”
100. JUSTICE MUST BE SERVED said... on Mar 17, 2012 at 09:39AM
“LOOKS LIKE YOU FOLKS NEED TO FILE A COMPLAINT TO THE SUPREME COURT'S ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON JUDICIAL CONDUCT THE PHONE NUMBER IS 609 292-2552. NOTE THEY MUST INVESTIGATE ALL REPORTS. THIS SHOULD HELP UNRAVEL THE CORRUPTION AND NOT COST YOU POOR HOMEOWNERS A PENNY. USE THE PUBLIC RESOURCES TO YOUR ADVANTAGE FOLKS. POLL THE HOMEOWNERS AND SUBPOENA THE OFFICIALS THAT PASSED THIS LEGISLATION AND MAYBE AC CAN BEGIN TO HEAL FROM THIS ATROCITY!”
101. Anonymous said... on Mar 17, 2012 at 10:07AM
“well what about the mayor that put him there in the first place?”
102. Anonymous said... on Mar 17, 2012 at 10:19AM
“SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT IS NOT CONSITITUTIONAL! DO THE POLITICIANS REALLY WANT AC TO COME BACK OR IS IT MORE SMOKE AND MIRRORS, HERE WE HAVE A MULTIMILLION DOLLAR LIABILITY OF MISCONDUCT FROM OUR LEADERS, SOMEONE TAKE CHARGE AND DONT LET THIS BANKRUPT OUR CITY. OR IS THIS THE INTENT OF LOCAL OFFICIALS TO SAVE THEIR REIGN?????? FOR WHAT....SO THAT WARD CAN ENJOY HIS HOTTUB IN SPEEDOS?”
103. Anonymous said... on Mar 17, 2012 at 10:40AM
“i want to hear from the person who heads code enforcement! save your ass and tell the public who directed you to enforce this? who approved the overtime? do you have records showing that these homeowners were in violation of other laws?”
104. Anonymous said... on Mar 17, 2012 at 10:50AM
“These homes on vrbo are bringing a "new product" to the AC market just as much as revel and look at what the leaders are willing to do to help them! its not all about big business mr governor, we are not asking you for money to train our service crew, we are taking the initiative ourselves to ensure a higher standard of service offered to patrons who visit our homes and our city. beleive it or not, we have been self sufficient without asking for govt assistance, does that not matter to you?”
105. For the People said... on Mar 17, 2012 at 11:04AM
“In reading though all of the comments, there is a common thread, outside of corruption, tourism, real estate, etc. Bottom line, our great nation was founded on the principle of freedom. Because of that we are an ever evolving nation with great beauty. In Nov we will vote for our choices, weekly we shop at the grocery for our choices, in the evening we channel surf for our choices. After reading the AC Master Plan, to become a tourist destination, the city must offer choices. Appears to this reader and citizen that these bullied homeowners only ask for the freedom to offer a choice to tourists, and be given the unencroached freedom to do so, They do not seem opposed to an ordinance to address quality of life, only to the restriction imposed on weekly rentals. Someone of an elevated intellect please intervene and solve this. It is an easy solution by rescinding this ordinance 49/50 and passing a quality of life ordinance (someone provided a link to a good animal house ordinance)”
106. Ivana said... on Mar 17, 2012 at 11:04AM
“Kathleen was the Code Enforcement Officer that was directed to do the sting on the homeowners. For the record she does not agree. She was given a list of properties by the director of Code Enforcement and told to work overtime on Saturdays and to write the citations. She was just doing her job as told to do. The supervisor of Code Enforcement is Gary Alston. E mail for all AC officials is their first name initial, last name @ cityofatlanticcity.org. galston@cityofatlanticcity.org”
107. Jim said... on Mar 17, 2012 at 11:12AM
“I imagine that both parties are only the messenger? I wonder who created the list and what the basis was.”
108. Shawna D said... on Mar 17, 2012 at 11:21AM
“This all sounds like a big mess. I didn't know about this, but support the homeowners. I hope you overcome this ordinance. Good luck. Geoff's page, please keep readers posted.”
109. George said... on Mar 17, 2012 at 11:28AM
“Stand your ground guys, this isn't right. Makes no sense at all. Does sound like you are getting a raw deal hang tough. I support you.”
110. Tyrone W said... on Mar 17, 2012 at 11:34AM
“Man oh man, this is outta control. Fix it Mr Mayor, fix it now. These people stand in line to pay taxes too, give em their chance. Come on.”
111. Evan Y said... on Mar 17, 2012 at 12:34PM
“I live in South Carolina, in an affluent area outside of Charleston. I own several townhomes in a very upscale development, beachfront. The association and local authorities undertsand the life that these homes for short term rental bring to their communities and welcome them with open arms. We in Carolina flourish with weekly rentals and local businesses LOVE the influx of guests who dine, purchase and pour $$$ upon their establishments. There are codes inforce regarding quality of life and property maintenance and this addresses the issues more than adequately. Our elected officials would NEVER dare stop the rentals as the municipalities benefit greatly. I have never heard of such an ordinance in a beach town or tourist locale. My friend sent me the link to this and I hope that these homeowners PUSH back hard. You're a minority AC, come up to par with all other resort spots.”
112. Group Power said... on Mar 17, 2012 at 12:38PM
“Do any of you homeowners pariticipate or have the option to enroll in a group pre paid legal plan? if so, start there, they will offer legal couseling for all matters related to real estate. this option will get you started for only 17 a month and will springboard you to get the pubicity you need to take it all the way to the supreme court. I am here to give you solutions so that you have a chance to win here. I know that financial constraints that many of you are being forced to face. Unfortunately lawyers are very expensive and you need to make sure you are being represented at this point or they will crush you. If any of you work for the govt, belong to a union or a large corporate employer, they usually offer these plans in your benefit package!”
113. Are they confused? said... on Mar 17, 2012 at 12:43PM
“Are we certain that city officials aren't confusint the true nuisance properties in their city with these vacation homes. The ones that line Atlantic, Artic, Baltic, etc where locals loiter, where frequently the bright lights/ big city is really just the flashing blues on a call to apprehend a suspect or police a noise issue, boarded houses that tourists probably think are crack houses. Where one cannot drive down the street without jaywalkers coming from between cars like the game frogger? All the aforementioned are turn-offs to tourists, the areas where owners have their vacation homes for rent give AC an EXCELLENT reputation, showing a completely different side to the city. A side that certain city officials want to remail hidden. These officials want to reap the benefits of their home getting the clean. reviatalized tourism district, but they don't want tourists to have a choice to experience this AC? CRDA, doesn't this contradict your strategies????”
114. Kevin S said... on Mar 17, 2012 at 10:08PM
“The ordinance make no sense as a tool to manage issues with vacation rentals; why didnt they just say "we dont want you to be in the city or have rights. We just want to stay in our coccoon of corruption. "”
115. Hanson said... on Mar 18, 2012 at 09:24AM
“No doubt that if these homeowners take legal action agst the city theyll win. Push back people.”
116. Anonymous said... on Mar 18, 2012 at 10:56AM
“Don't see much hope in AC with the same ole same ole city regime. Everyone knows theyre a joke. The state needs to take over to save the source of revenue for NJ. AC officials are thugs.”
117. Anonymous said... on Mar 18, 2012 at 10:56AM
“Don't see much hope in AC with the same ole same ole city regime. Everyone knows theyre a joke. The state needs to take over to save the source of revenue for NJ. AC officials are thugs.”
118. Anonymous said... on Mar 18, 2012 at 12:08PM
“I have to agree with bookworm”
119. Channing said... on Mar 18, 2012 at 12:37PM
“I think that this is really unfortunate for the homeowners. Im glad I havent invested in the city if they treat actual taxpayers like that. I hear these people pay anywhere from $6000 - $9000 in property taxes. Guess these "wise" city officials prefer vacant houses or delinquent taxes.”
120. Teresa said... on Mar 18, 2012 at 03:24PM
“I have stayed in one of the vacation rentals a couple of times with my family. We loved the neighborhood and the house. We spent tons of money at the outlets, boardwalk and other ac businesses. We chise ti come there over another shore area because we found the vacation homes, otherwise withour kids - and my parents we could never come there for a week. Dies the city not want nice families visiting?”
121. Anonymous said... on Mar 18, 2012 at 03:49PM
“Just a thought on comment 120 who seemed to question if ac wants them. I think businesses, casinos,CRDA and state do desperately want you to choose AC, but I dont think the city officials really care if ghey are a destination for families or anybody else. I think they just see it as more potential work.”
122. Unanimous said... on Mar 19, 2012 at 08:05AM
“I agree #121. I just think the city is still being run by incompetents who only have an interest in themselves and how they want things. They think it is their town and resent all outsiders. Including CRDA and especially Gov Christie. Theyd prefer to rule over a delapidated city with only their little clique around. They have their greedy hands out in entitlement but have no plans to give back, yet instead try to hold back any influx of new residents or any changes that may push them outside their cardboard box.”
123. Anonymous said... on Mar 19, 2012 at 01:02PM
“Looks like the homeowners will have the last laugh......all the way to the bank!
”
124. Daryl Bulthuis said... on Mar 19, 2012 at 03:05PM
“I brought this up at Pinkys boardwalk committee meeting and at a CRDA board meeting... They replied with this ordnance does not apply to properties in the tourism district.... Only the neighborhoods outside the district. I agree that tourism should be encouraged anywhere in the city.”
125. Rick N said... on Mar 20, 2012 at 08:28AM
“Problem sounds like there are multiples agenda that do not work together yet instead oppose. I dont really think any of the agencies truly care. Their involvement is not altruistic. Homeowners just resign yourselves to continuing to fight. My support is on the homeowners' sides!”
126. Laugh to keep from crying said... on Mar 20, 2012 at 09:45AM
“I hope everyone is prepared for Ordinance 51 which says that anyone with a weight problem who chooses to wear shorts that are too small will be fined $250. If they are eating ice cream, the fine doubles and may include jail time. And I hear they are discussing Ordinance 52 which dictates that people who get in the grocery store line dedicated to 15 items or less with 20 items are subject to citizen's arrest. Tone deaf people singing, body odor, annoying laughs, smelly food wafting from your neighbor's windows...lets just make it all illegal!
”
127. LOL #126 said... on Mar 20, 2012 at 05:47PM
“You summed it up perfectly #126! These ordinances are clearly an intrusion upon rights. So whose to say more absurd ordinances are not on the way?”
128. Ivana said... on Mar 21, 2012 at 08:42AM
“We did some rough figures and what we found was astonishing. Three rental properties rented agressively add almost ONE MILLION DOLLARS a year to the economic engine of ATLANTIC CITY. Vacation Home renters come to Atlantic City come to Atlantic City with MONEY and THEY SPEND IT RIGHT HERE!”
129. This is a crime.... said... on Mar 21, 2012 at 01:28PM
“What is really a crime is that when these homeowners purchased these properties years ago, there were no such ordinances in place that restricted renting their homes. Years and hundreds/millions of investment dollars later, they change the rules and place hardship on these homeowners. Who gains to benefit? Whatever happened to the Grandfather Rule? The last time I looked, short sales and foreclosure were on the rise which depresses home prices. A.C. just can't seem to get out of its own way.”
130. Anonymous said... on Mar 21, 2012 at 03:38PM
“Let's audit the financial records of these officials and see if any one of them have rented out their places for large events....Heard thru the grapevine a councilman took 5k for 3 days during the Dave Matthews weekend last year”
131. Anonymous said... on Mar 21, 2012 at 03:41PM
“You've been targeted Ivana, your only way out is to put one of these thugs on your payroll! Mark my words”
132. Still curious said... on Mar 22, 2012 at 08:14AM
“I am still curious about the earlier comments regarding the city solicitor who pushed this ordinance for personal reasons. As a recently appointed ac judge, Is he going to preside at the citation hearings and how could this be allowed if so? What happened to justice? Furthermore, integrity? What an outrage this whole situation is.”
133. Anonymous said... on Mar 22, 2012 at 10:35AM
“Thanks for bringing this to my attention. Now I know I can stop my next door neighbor from renting his house every week for bachelor parties. Who do I report him to.”
134. Anonymous said... on Mar 22, 2012 at 02:33PM
“Wow how short cited of you 133! Scenarios of noise disturbance can be handled other ways that have zero impact to the local economy. I’m sure any owner would address a noise concern very promptly! Did you not read the other comments concerning this? You would rather have your neighborhood in significant decline due to foreclosures and loss of income which in turn would cause your own property value to decline?.. what about civil rights? maybe you’re a seasonal/yearly renter I don’t think an owner would be this short cited.”
135. Trish said... on Mar 22, 2012 at 02:50PM
“#133 is Bruce or Beverly ward. Anonymous my ass”
136. Anonymous said... on Mar 22, 2012 at 02:55PM
“That's exactly it #134, the ordinance 49/50 are NOT a solution. An animal house ordinance is a tool to manage these issues. Rescind 49/50 propose animal house ordinance. Dont restrict tourism, promote responsible behavior of all parties”
137. Bankrupt said... on Mar 23, 2012 at 10:41PM
“All of this is not right. I am sorry to hear this is happening in the AC area. I was served with the same type of notice from another State. I am researching the options available and what steps are available. When you invest in a property (6 months ago) and now find your income options are gone your own individual rights and ability to provide a living can be shattered. I was going to fight our decision but found it would cost upwards of $20,000. That just was not possible. I am still researching but it looks like an option is to hire a national law firm. All chip in and build a case for the industry and stand our ground. Lets find some positive and active solutions.”
138. Ivana said... on Apr 9, 2012 at 09:29AM
“Yes the Judge who wrote the ordinance is presiding over my three violation hearings rescheduled for May.”